Course Outline

list High School / Advanced Statistics and Data Science I (ABC)

Book
  • High School / Advanced Statistics and Data Science I (ABC)
  • High School / Statistics and Data Science I (AB)
  • High School / Statistics and Data Science II (XCD)
  • High School / Algebra + Data Science (G)
  • College / Introductory Statistics with R (ABC)
  • College / Advanced Statistics with R (ABCD)
  • College / Accelerated Statistics with R (XCD)
  • CKHub: Jupyter made easy

4.9 Sources of Variation

We have discussed what it means for an explanatory variable to explain variation in an outcome variable, and we have learned some ways to explore this idea with data visualizations. Let’s now zoom out a little and think more broadly about where variation in data comes from. There are three important points we want to make about sources of variation.

(1) Variation Can Be Either Explained or Unexplained

Diagram of Variation in Data. A box on the left is labeled as Variation in Data. This box has two separate arrows coming from it that each point to a different box on the right. The box on the top is labeled as Explained, and the box on the bottom is labeled as Unexplained.

Consider the word equation Thumb = Height + Other Stuff. Explained variation is the portion of the total variation in the outcome (i.e., thumb length) we can attribute to the explanatory variable (height). The rest of the variation (or remaining variation after accounting for the explanatory variable) is left unexplained. Other stuff represents this unexplained variation. It’s useful to think of total variation as the sum of explained and unexplained variation.

(2) Some Unexplained Variation Can Be Explained

Some of the unexplained variation in an outcome variable can be explained, if we add the right variables to our model. For example, we have data on Sex in the Fingers dataframe. If we added sex to our model (in addition to height), some of the remaining variation in thumb lengths, beyond that explained by height alone, might be explained.

There also might be other variables that could explain some of the variation in thumb lengths if only we had measured them. For example, nutritional intake, toe lengths, mother’s thumb lengths, etc. might all explain some of the variation in thumb lengths.

The variation that could have been explained by other variables (whether measured or unmeasured), if only we had included them in the model, are part of Other Stuff. If we add an explanatory variable to the model and hence explain more of the variation, the amount left unexplained (i.e., Other Stuff) will be decreased by that same amount. The work of the data analyst can be thought of as increasing the proportion of variation that is explained, while decreasing the proportion left unexplained.

Can we ever explain all of the variation in an outcome? Almost certainly not. Even if we measured a lot of variables and added them to our model, there would still be some variation in thumb lengths that we could not explain. This doesn’t mean that it could never be explained but just that, for now, it is too hard to explain.

Variation in Data (the outcome variable) can be split into Explained variation (the part accounted for by the explanatory variable) and Unexplained variation (also known as the Other Stuff). The Unexplained variation can be split into Can be explained variation (the variation that could be explained by including other explanatory variables) and Too hard to explain variation.

(3) Unexplained Variation Can Be Thought of as Random

Practically speaking, there will always be unexplained variation. Statisticians deal with this unexplained variation by thinking of it as random. Even though we can’t fully explain why one thumb is longer than another, we can assume that, over time, the unexplained variation will be distributed in a predictable way.

For example, many of the statistical models you will learn about in this class assume that unexplained variation is randomly distributed as a normal distribution. Based on this assumption, we can say that the predictions made by these models are as likely to be too high as they are to be too low, and that most of the prediction errors will be off by just little, with only a few being off by a lot. We will say more about this later in the book!

Responses